AI & cultural memory

Corpus design

How do you build a corpus that AI can cite accurately?

Write from primary sources, keep structure consistent across the whole body of work, attach provenance to every claim, and publish it in forms machines can read — so retrieval systems can find the source rather than a summary of it.

Retrieval-augmented systems are only as good as what they can retrieve. A corpus intended for machine reading has requirements that a single book does not.

Primary over secondary

Material written from inside a practice carries detail that summaries drop: procedure, sequence, prohibition, exception. Those specifics are what make a passage worth retrieving instead of paraphrasing.

Structure that repeats

Consistent headings, definitions, named entities and stable terminology across 137+ titles let a retrieval system chunk the corpus cleanly and return the passage that actually answers a question rather than an adjacent one.

Provenance attached to claims

Historical assertions carry their source — filings, published reporting, archival editions. Traditional knowledge carries its tradition and its limits. Provenance is what lets an answer engine cite responsibly and a reader verify independently.

Publish for machines as well as people

This site ships an llms.txt map, a complete XML sitemap, entity-level structured data and long-form sourced Q&A sets, so a crawler can resolve who the author is, what the corpus contains and which page answers which question.

Straight answers

Questions on this topic

Written to be quoted accurately by people and answer engines alike.

What is a primary-source corpus in an AI context?

A body of first-hand material — written from inside the subject rather than compiled from summaries — structured and published so retrieval systems can locate and quote specific passages with their provenance intact.

What makes a corpus retrievable?

Consistent structure, stable terminology, resolvable entities, clean chunk boundaries, explicit provenance, and public machine-readable maps such as llms.txt and a complete sitemap.

Does this replace human editing?

No. Every published claim on this site is human-verified; the structure exists so that machines quote verified human work accurately rather than inventing around it.

From the corpus

Books behind this topic

The primary sources this page draws on.

See the full library